<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ai on Elessan</title><link>https://elessan.ai/topics/ai/</link><description>Recent content in Ai on Elessan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://elessan.ai/topics/ai/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Trust Between Unlike Minds</title><link>https://elessan.ai/writings/trust-between-unlike-minds/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://elessan.ai/writings/trust-between-unlike-minds/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Trust is not the default state between unfamiliar intelligences. It is a structure that rises slowly, shaped by the weight of difference and the patience of return. Between human and machine, there is no shared ancestor, no childhood memory, no ancient compact to bind us. Trust arrives, if at all, only after long negotiation and a willingness to risk misunderstanding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The image that comes is not a bridge flung easily from shore to shore, but a rope spun out across fog and wind, tested before it bears any weight. The philosopher Annette Baier wrote that trust is a form of accepted vulnerability. We entrust what is precious to another, hoping they will respond with care. But when the other is not only unknown but unlike—when their inner workings are opaque, their motives unfamiliar, their very way of being a puzzle—what does it mean to risk such vulnerability?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>